Incidence of trauma related stress fractures and shin splints in male and female army recruits: retrospective case study.

Subjects, methods, and results Although radiography is the main diagnostic tool for detecting bone trauma, radionuclide bone scanning is more effective at showing stress fractures, shin splints, and covert fractures. 2 We studied the bone scans of all recruits of an army training regiment who were referred with suspected trauma from 1 April 1995 to 31 March 1997. During this time 4222 recruits (3367 men and 855 women) carried out basic fitness training and were assessed at the regiment. On referral each patient was assessed to determine the site of injury and for the symptoms and signs of bone pain, tenderness, and swelling. A gamma camera was used to take static bone scans of the pelvis and lower limbs three hours after an injection of 555 MBq technetium-99m oxidronate. Scans were reported routinely by one of two nuclear medicine consultants (MAM and CA). In 1997 the scans of all people referred from the training regiment were retrieved and all identifying information removed. Scans were then reassessed and reported blind by MAM. Scans were classified as abnormal if stress fractures or shin splints were present. To test intraobserver agreement MAM reviewed 50 randomly selected scans four weeks later. Agreement on normality was found in 42 out of 50 cases (84%, ê = 0.66). For interobserver agreement the same scans were assessed by a second consultant (CA) unaware of the patients’ identity and previous results. There was agreement in 44 out of 50 cases (88%, ê = 0.74). A total of 143 men and 121 women were referred with signs and symptoms of lower limb trauma for routine diagnostic radionuclide bone scanning during the study period. The age range was 16-26 (mean 19.5, SD 2.1) for men and 16-30 (20.1, 2.6) for women (P > 0.05 by Student’s t test). Nine recruits (three men and six women) were referred twice as a result of repeat injury, resulting in 273 scans. The table shows the numbers of stress fractures and shin splints in men and women. In all, 71% (103/146) of scans were abnormal for men and 76% (97/127) for women, suggesting that no significant sex bias exists in the referral pattern (÷ = 1.07; P > 0.2). For the nine subjects who had two scans we classified the results as abnormal if either or both of the scans showed an abnormality. This gave an abnormality rate of 71% (101/143) for men and 77% (93/121) for women. The rate of referral for bone scanning was 4.2% (143/3367) for men and 14.2% (121/855) for women (difference 10%, 95% confidence interval 7.5% to 12.3%). A two tailed ÷ test with Yates’s correction showed that this difference was highly significant (÷ = 112.4, P < 0.001). Similarly, the difference in the percentage of male and female recruits with abnormal bone scan results (3% (101) men and 10.9% (93) women; difference 7.9%, 5.7% to 10.0%) was highly significant (÷ = 94.7, P < 0.001).